We have asked a number of Canadian experts in Additive Manufacturing to provide us with their views on the year by answering some questions. Additive Manufacturing – Year in review – 2018
As we approach the end of the year and look back, we see that a lot has happened in the world of Additive Manufacturing. To help bring the year into perspective, we have asked a number of Canadian experts in Additive Manufacturing to provide us with their views on the year by answering some questions.
- What trends have you seen this past year in AM?
- Any announcements from the past year that grabbed your attention?
- What is one thing from the past year that has you hopeful for Canada’s AM industry and what opportunities exist for Canada going forward in AM?
- What apprehensions do you have and what are some upcoming challenges?
- Any words of advice for those looking to use AM in the coming year?
These questions have been answered by (in alphabetical order):
- Peter Adams, President & CEO of Burloak Technologies Inc
- Dr. Mathieu Brochu, Associate Professor at McGill University
- Gilles Desharnais, President of Axis Prototypes Inc.
- Dr. Philippe Dupuis, President & Co-founder of Creadditive Solutions 3D
- Martin Petrak, Co-Founder & CEO of Precision ADM
- Cassidy Silbernagel, Expert in AM and Design, future PhD graduate
- Dr. Ehsan Toyserkani, Professor at the University of Waterloo
- Dr. Tonya Wolfe, Senior Research Engineer at InnoTech Alberta
Canada Makes would like to thank our contributors for taking the time to share their expertise.
What trends have you seen this past year in AM?
From my perspective,adoption of AM for series production has been the main trend in 2018. It seems that reliable, repeatable and affordable mass production is eventually on the horizon by AM processes. Hardware speed and quality improvements, reliable software and a larger pool of materials adopted for AM are some of the main eye-catching trends in 2018.
Major meaningful initiatives for full adoption of AM to the automotive industry have been surfaced. Thanks to the first point mentioned above.
The last year has been a turning point in AM here in Alberta from a perspective of AM being a technology for other industries in other countries to one that should be implemented in current practice now. There seems to be more designers using a desktop printer for visualization and prototyping purposes, so the growth into production will be an inevitable next step.
We have noted that AM is now a mainstream event at conferences and tradeshows both in Canada and internationally. It is no longer a small dispersion of companies but now has its own dedicated halls and conference streams.
The technology is reaching to more remote areas and enabling local ideation and manufacturing. However, risk of adopting premature technology is crippling the competitiveness of the local industries. Perhaps there is an overabundance of new technology and companies are anxious in deciding what areas are best for their growth?
Metal is king. FDM leads the way for Polymers… HP is now delivering and aggressively pushing MultiJet Fusion.
In the metal world, big industrial players have joined the field and are making their mark – Trumpf, DMG Mori, AddUp (Michelin-Five), GE are adding a layer of seriousness to the Powder Bed market. The “prototyping” manufacturers (EOS, 3D Systems, SLM, Renishaw), are now being challenged by companies that have experience in making robust industrial machines that can reproduce the same quality.
The metal presence at FormNext was impressive and the marketing investment by the metal players showed the seriousness that they put into this market.
There is also a big trend of powder metallurgy being used as a source of additive manufacturing of metal. People like BASF, DeskTop Metal, MarkForged, XJet, HP are bringing to market solutions that rely on the science of powder metallurgy to facilitate 3D Printing. Now, there are serious challenges associated to the powder metallurgy process that is causing challenges for these solutions, namely the challenge of the part shrinkage during the post processing which can alter dimensions of the parts. Most if not all of the manufacturers are investing into the post-process and software to resolve this issue, however, to date, the solutions are not stable and universally applicable. There is progress however, and these processes could significantly impact the cost of metal 3D Printing components.
On the Polymer side, HP Multijet Fusion seems to have finally ironed out the kinks in their systems and can now ship systems that are relatively stable. HP’s aggressive marketing appears to be generating results as the number of systems being shipped is growing.
For Thermoplastics, the continued advanced on the FDM front are apparent. More and more materials are being offered with most of the big engineered plastic players now present in the field… BASF, Covestro, DSM, Dupont, etc. In addition, numerous small production houses with their own recipes is increasing the scope of the offering. On the machine side, the low bar has been set for years, and now we are seeing a growing number of high temperature solution, and also, the growing availability of large format FDM printing.
It seems that the industry is moving away from printing cool trinkets and toys as a way to showcase the technology, and rather highlighting solutions to problems which the technology can help solve. This is a much better way to help change the mindset from the idea that 3D printing is just for making cool little plasticy things. The power of Additive Manufacturing comes from it’s potential applications, which requires a different mindset. Part of this shift requires seeing the solutions others have come up with, and that is much better done with actual plastic fixtures for tooling rather than Yoda figurines and toy boats.
As you know, I am only involved in metal AM. Some key aspects that I found interesting, but that can all be summarized under “pushing the boundaries of AM”. I believe the race to launch AM platform has slowed down, but strengthening of what is existing has occurred. We are seeing more automation of system (fully integrated systems), where human intervention is reduced and performance optimization is increased. The field has now pushed the boundary of maximum built angle with new and innovative laser raster path, we are seeing several attempts at increasing the built speed, with multi-lasers, new recoaters, attempts to increase the powder layer thicknesses, etc. New intergrated systems with built and sinter platform integrated, etc. All these developments will definitely contributes to bring AM closer to mainstream manufacturing.
Metal additive manufacturing applications are on the rise with a growing demand for metals like Titanium, Inconel and Stainless Steel.
Consolidation of AM equipment offerings by industry giants continued to dominate the discussion in 2018. Large manufacturers such as Stratasys jumping into the metal additive manufacturing space, following GE Additive’s new investments in metal technologies is exciting as it validates many experts’ opinion that the massive adoption of metal AM is right around the corner.
At Burloak we see customers moving from a tire kicking phase of evaluation into full blown qualifications of programs. This seems to be driven by several factors including – better understanding of the material performance – Better standards definition – the availability of multilaser AM systems which are lowering the cost of manufacture – A much more serious approach to identifying suitable applications and finally that the machine platforms are becoming more robust.
Any announcements from the past year that grabbed your attention?
Health Canada publishing a draft guidance document for the use of AM to produce Class III and IV medical devices paves the way to broader acceptance of this game-changing technology in the medical field for Canada. This announcement followed the CRIQ’s major investment in a medical additive manufacturing center in Quebec City and Renishaw’s opening of the ADEISS center in London, Ontario which all point towards Canada setting itself up to become a global competitor in manufacturing medical devices using AM.
Nothing in particular, but its more the sum of all the new opportunities, that now once integrated, makes AM even more concrete. The points discussed above.
On The machines side I would say that EOS announcement of the laser array system which will lower cycle times to fractions of todays systems for plastic builds signals where the industry is heading. Several of the major metals groups finally brought their multi laser technologies to market and there have been multiple developments on the post processing side which we like.
With respect to the AM supply chain I would say that there have been a number of very large announcements that signal a shift in the market. Burloak Technologies a division of Samuel announced its $104M AMCE in Oakville, Ontario. Carpenter Technologies announced a new large scale technology centre along with the acquisition of LPW. Oerlikon continued to roll out its $300M+ investment in its AM supply chain. Siemens opened its new Material Solutions technology centre in the UK with approx. $70M of investment and Voestalpine continued to open AM focused facilities.
I found it interesting that all of these announcements had similar themes with respect to what the industry perceives is needed to be successful in additive production parts manufacture in that all of the companies focused not just on AM machinery, but rather on the whole value proposition from design through manufacture, heat treatment, machining and materials qualification as part of the service. We certainly believe that these levels of investment are really the minimum to deliver certified production parts.
Canada has its very first Metal AM machine innovator and supplier: Nanogrande, that officially unveiled the MPL-1, the world’s first nanoscale metal particle 3D printer at Fabtech 2018 in Atlanta.
HP’ announcement that they will go into metal additive with a binder jetting – powder metallurgy type solution.
Burloak (Samuel) commitment to their new center.
One that stands out is the TRUMPF announcement of using a green laser in a production machine and that their new printer will allow pre-heat temperatures of up to 500°C. If these two things were in the same machine, it would allow almost any material to be printed because the energy from green lasers is better absorbed by almost all metals including pure copper and aluminium, and the high pre-heat temperature reduces the thermal differential from meltpool to solid, thus reducing the internal stresses in a part, and may allow for crack suseptable materials such as nickel super-alloys to be better processed.
We are very proud of Onstream Technologies using AM in pipeline applications. They are a success story of design and implementation of AM technology to improve their products.
We have also noted that large number of collaborations that are occurring in AM outside of Canada between sectors and types of organizations. The need to work cross-disciplinary has been realized and will strengthen adoption. This is happening in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes, but has yet to be formalized in Western Canada.
Companies such as Ethiad and Navantia are fully adopting the technology on a variety of scales. I am not aware of Canadian companies fully adopting the technology yet throughout their practice or having an AM business unit. In Alberta, large companies do not yet understand where AM can be integrated into their processes, but change is starting.
I think the diagram Digital Alloys put out recently showing all the metal AM processes is telling of where we are in metal AM. There is a lot going on and we need to be cognizant that no one technology will solve all problems. There is also a lot of work to do to decide which processes meet a company’s manufacturing needs. For example, understanding tolerances in AM is not yet fully understood, but is critical for adoption into AM.
- BMW’s Additive Manufacturing Campus
- Carbon+ Adidas collaboration
What is one thing from the past year that has you hopeful for Canada’s AM industry and what opportunities exist for Canada going forward in AM?
I am hopeful the superclusters and the initiation of the HI-AM will be a supportive role for AM in Canada. The trade issues that have evolved recently have initiated discussions regarding reshoring manufacturing. We have a number of unique industries that will benefit from adoption of AM (energy, agriculture and marine). These industries need some time to redevelop their designs to take advantage of additive manufacturing.
I am an avid supporter for women in technology and manufacturing. AM makes manufacturing more accessible to bright, creative people. We have initiated an Alberta Additive Manufacturing Network, with the goal to make the technology accessible and at a lower risk. The number of participants will quickly grow over the next year.
GE Additive is being a phenomenal evangelist to the Additive Industry with their remarkable case studies for part consolidation as a driver to their manufacturing future. With this, GE is working with Canadian manufacturers allowing these opportunities from south of the border to stimulate the Canadian AM market.
We have seen significant investments in AM capability and capacity in Canada in 2018. There is great opportunity for Canadian companies large or small to become global leaders in the Additive Manufacturing value and supply chains. With Canada’s strong natural resource base, AM capacity and capability, as well as manufactured product export track record, I feel Canada will continue to be highly competitive in AM well into the future.
The above announcements have changed the pace of AM in Canada, both academically and industrially. Canada can be a leader in R&D and also AM adoption to different industries such as aerospace and automotive.
The discussion around AM is starting to shift from the verticals it has been typically constrained to (aerospace, for example) towards other sectors which were once thought of as more conservative and less promising. The automotive, energy as well as oil and gas sectors are increasingly joining the bandwagon for AM adoption, and we at Creadditive are seeing a lot of interest from the construction sector in exploring disruptive technologies which could help them address the challenges that are typical of labour-intensive and extremely complex multi-discipline projects. In terms of opportunity, Canada is a very natural-resource rich country, and has a very strong position in metal powder manufacturing with companies such as AP&C, Tekna, Pyrogenesis and Equispheres, so I hope we can learn from these success stories and build an AM material processing infrastructure around our organic materials resources such as petroleum-based plastics and bio-plastic from wood products for both western and eastern Canada.
Obviously you would expect me to say that the Burloak Additive Manufacturing Centre of Excellence was the major announcement that I believe puts Canada in a lead position. Beyond that, I think the continued adoption by academia is critical and very welcome although I do think that we need to be careful that these academic centres focus remains on R & D and education and not competing with industry as this will kill investment by the private sector. Another noteworthy event was the major expansions undertaken in Canada by AP& C and Equispheres.
I’m excited about Canada’s Innovation Supercluster Initiative and hope that it will help grow Canada’s AM sector, because right now it is very small and young compared to what is happening in Europe and the US. At the same time, this opens up great possibilities for growth and adoption in Canada for the technology.
To me, Canada is a raw material supplier and a end user of the technology. Massive investments in metal powder production is occurring to offer a wide variety of high quality products to the market. We are also seeing the number of printing bureau and OEM increasing the number of machine, testing the products, learning the technology. The important footsteps for a healthy AM adoption is on-going.
What apprehensions do you have and what are some upcoming challenges?
Although the level of misconception about the potential of AM has been reduced over the last few years, it is still a big challenge to control public and industry expectation. This may create negative impression if the technology readiness level will not be able to fulfil unrealistic conceptions that are wrongly disseminated in industry and public.
Other worry is the low momentum in the adoption of new materials to the portfolio of metal AM. For instance, more than 1,000 ferrous alloys are commercially available for conventional manufacturing such as casting, machining and forming; however, only a handful number of ferrous alloys have been verified for AM systems and limited production by original equipment manufacturers. Customization and validation of AM metal powders and introducing them to the market usually takes years of research and development. This may simply undermine the current momentum in AM
The biggest challenge for AM in the coming years will be the attraction and retention of skilled labour. The education network in Canada is strong and well versed in AM, but will most likely struggle to produce enough talent to compensate for the shortage. Companies will need to invest in training employees on the job instead of relying on a previously built skill-set. This type of training will also put pressure on the too-few equipment hours available in the marketplace already. In this sense, the challenge will be to create a model and ecosystem where academia can open the doors to laboratories and classrooms for industry and to create continuing education opportunities to reskill factory workers with skills in traditional manufacturing towards the technical skills required for AM.
I believe cost remains the main challenge. Cost with the capital “C”. Anything that will bring down the cost is a challenge to be solved if AM is to be mainstream and not only for smaller hi-end products. We have to keep in mind that the competing technologies are also getting technological improvements, it’s a ferocious competition. Talent is another key aspects, but numerous schools with various education level are tackling this issue.
We think that the industry leading OEM’s may try to commoditize the market too soon and that this would lead to investment shortfalls and the industry would not reach its potential. The powder supply chain may not be ready to meet the scale up although investments by AP&C, Carpenter, Praxair, Equispheres etc. make provides some comfort.
I am concerned about risk averse company culture and the fear of ‘being first’. We need to support retraining in the areas of mechatronics, design for additive, digital twins and data analytics. It will be very challenging to hire people with these skill sets for the foreseeable future, so they will need to be developed internally.
The lack of investment in capital infrastructure compared to other jurisdictions is concerning. It will be challenging to compete with limited resources.
My apprehension is the long term viability of Powder Bed with its significant overhead associated with supports.
I’m worried about the adoption level of AM in Canada. There is so much potential for it’s use, but Canada seems to be lagging behind the rest of the world when it comes to adoption. Before there can be any meaningful growth in this area in Canada, individuals and companies need to be aware of what AM can do for them, which means a lot of education is required for this awareness. However, Europe gained this awareness a decade ago and are showing massive growth in this area, and Canada is playing catch-up. If Canada doesn’t rapidly adopt this technology, they will miss out on some potentially huge opportunities.
Any words of advice for those looking to use AM in the coming year?
I would say that you need to understand your motivation for trying AM and that you find a potential partner who can not only guide you through the process, but can demonstrate their technical competence and ability to scale with you to production.
Jump in and see what others are doing in the rest of the world with AM. Then try and find the experts who can help guide you in the journey to adopt AM. Realise that AM may not solve all of your problems, and it may not be the best solution, but on the otherhand, it could do all those things. It’s potential reaches beyond just prototypes and proof-of-concept. It can be used as actual end-use products, or help make those end-use products faster and cheaper.
Go before its too late. However, one need to understand that starting in AM is not as easy as it looks, and lots of efforts must be put down downstream of the first order is completed. AM is a fascinating field, but integrating all these multi-disciplinary field under one technology remains a challenge. Who would have thought we would go to the moon… and we did. Who would have thought 3D printing would be mainstream at one point in time, and it will happen.
There is opportunity for those who can provide design for AM solutions. However, the human element is more important than ever before. We need to collaborate, challenge assumptions and share ideas. AM cannot be done simply by uploading a drawing to the cloud and receiving the part in the mail a few days later. The best solutions are found by collaborative convergence.
Most engineers are still thinking linearly and need strategies to think organically. This process takes time and there are several failures leading to the final successful design. Companies need to support this process.
Start small but start now. Additive manufacturing is going to proliferate at high speed in industrial spaces as the business cases for AM gain traction and attention. The key issue will be to know when and how AM can provide an edge by adding value to a product or workflow, instead of trying to use this tool to directly replace other manufacturing processes where competition is fierce. In this case, incremental adoption can outperform complete workflow rework by ensuring the best process is chosen on its own merits, not due to its novelty or to its disruptive quality. Remember: “The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese”!
I would recommend that those companies that are looking to adopt AM start to have dialogue with key AM players in Canada (e.g., Canada Makes, Burloak, HI-AM, MSAM, etc.). This will minimize the risk of their investment. These groups emphasis strengthening collaborative interactions between academic researchers, the Canadian manufacturing industry, industrial organizations, government researchers, and international collaborators by addressing complex technical issues associated with metal AM.
My best advise to most organization and companies interested in AM is to invest in knowledge and formal training in Design for Additive Manufacturing. Keep an eye on new software developments that will make it easier to go from design to print in the near future.
Canada Makes is pleased to welcome Calgary based Exergy Solutions to its network of experts in 3D Printing. Exergy is a leader in 3D modelling, 3D printing, engineering and research to the energy, utilities and mining sectors.
“Adoption of additive manufacturing to help increase productivity and capability is about to take off for the oil & gas sector. Exergy, partnering with the Canada Makes network of experts, will be ready for the upcoming opportunities,” said Frank Defalco Manager Canada Makes.
“We have leveraged additive manufacturing to study revolutionary technology aimed at improving the competitiveness and environmental performance of the Oil Sands industry. Many of these technologies are game changers. Well positioned to drastically lower GHG emissions and eliminate tailing ponds. Canada Makes has already helped us to instantly build a network of additive experts across Canada. This gives us the opportunity to engage knowledge and experience coast to coast in improving an industry that is vital to the Canadian economy.” said Billy Rideout, President Exergy Solutions.
About Exergy Solutions
Exergy Solutions is focused on delivering innovation and step-change technological improvement to their customers. The creative team at Exergy has experience leveraging disruptive technologies and agile project management methods. Exergy believes in the enormous talent and technological know-how across Canada that can be used to accelerate the adoption of additive manufacturing. Together with their business partners network enable project development and effective integration of complete technology solutions. This wide-range of services include as-build drawings, drafting, 3D modelling, engineering design, 3D scanning, 3D printing, virtual reality and turn-key R&D projects. exergysolutions.com
Montreal, December 3, 2018 – In presence of more than fifty guests, the president and founder of Nanogrande, Mr. Juan Schneider, officially unveiled the MPL-1, the world first metal nanoscale 3D printer. Built around its patented technology – the Power LayeringTM – to form particle layers, MPL-1 makes nanotechnology accessible to a whole new market by opening the door for additive manufacturing.“We believe this new approach to 3D printing is a revolution that will allow us to set new industry standards,” said Schneider. “The Power LayeringTM allows the MPL-1 to use particles of any shape, size and type. We can use particles as small as a nanometer, but also particles of 5 microns, which is the size the industry is currently looking for, while maximizing the compaction of particles.”
“This is a special announcement as Nanogrande is the only company manufacturing a metal powder additive machine in Canada,” said Frank Defalco Manager Canada Makes.”We look forward to working with Nanogrande to help develop new AM applications using this exciting new technology.”
The high level of particle compaction achieved by the Power LayeringTM, as well as the size of the particles, considerably eliminate the needs for support structures typical of 3D printing. This way, there is a noticeable reduction in post-printing costs. In addition, Nanogrande can offer its particles at a lower cost because the process does not require expensive spherical particles.
The founder of Nanogrande also took the opportunity to congratulate his team for their hard work and the many sacrifices for the start up. The development of MPL-1 took several years of work.
“Today we are witnessing the culmination of a long process of research and development that has given us the chance to set up a team that generates many innovative ideas,” said Schneider. “Alone, it is possible to have excellent ideas; but, as a team, we can bring these ideas to life. I am very pleased to highlight the success of the efforts of the people who work for Nanogrande.”
Nanogrande develops and produces for the leading manufacturers the first nanoscale 3D printer to meet their needs for solutions for the manufacturing of microparts and high precision components.
Pour information : Frédéric Mayer
Communication and operations
Last week was a whirlwind tour of the very best the world of additive manufacturing has to offer at Formnext 2018 in Frankfurt Germany for the Canada Makes delegation. It began on Monday November 12th with TraCLight’s (the Transatlantic Cluster for Lightweighting) Annual Cluster meeting in Stuttgart, followed by on-sight industrial visits of Trumpf and Advanced Clean Production (ACP).
Below are pictures of some the highlights of the week. We thank the following companies for hosting our delegation; BigRep, BASF 3D Printing Solutions, DMG MORI, 3D Systems, ADD UP, Renishaw, Fraunhofer, GE Additive, SLM Solutions and Tekna.
The following is a list of participants to this year’s Formnext; Precision ADM, Kilmarnock Enterprise, AON3D, Renishaw Canada, McGill University, The University of Waterloo, Québec Metallurgy Centre (CMQ), Exergy Solutions, Promation, Axis Prototypes, Anubis 3D and CAD MicroSolutions.
Next week, Canada Makes leads its second trade mission to Formnext and third to Germany. Twelve companies and academic institutions, which includes some of Canada’s leading additive manufacturing experts, will join the mission. Leading off the week is a key addition to this year’s agenda, an invitation to TraCLight’s (the Transatlantic Cluster for Lightweighting) Annual Cluster meeting in Stuttgart, followed by on-sight industrial visits to Trumpf and Advanced Clean Production (ACP).
The Canada Makes trade mission is a great way to connect with international additive manufacturing leaders as well as building strong relationships with fellow delegates. The weeks itinerary includes meetings arranged by Canada Makes with world-leading companies in AM. Trade missions are about opening doors, gaining new insight and building business-to-business contacts offering an excellent opportunity to learn about this emerging technology.
On Thursday November 15th at 1:15 pm on stage 2 on the Formnext Conference be sure not to miss one of Canada’s leading AM experts, McGill Professor Mathieu Brochu. His presentation “Pulse Laser Powder Bed Fusion; Opening New Opportunities to Control Metallurgy and Manufactured Advanced Parts”, is sure to be interesting, insightful and, knowing Mathieu, entertaining.
A special highlight of this year’s show is the Formnext Start-Up Challenge, awarded to companies founded within the last five years who offered new and innovating ideas to the AM industry.
We are very pleased to learn that Canada Makes’ partner Nanogrande is among this year’s winners for its molecular-scale additive manufacturing system—the first of its kind.
Named the MPL-1, it is capable of assembling highly packed multilayers of particles (as thin as one nm) using various materials, including oxides, metals, waxes and polymers. The extremely high resolution process patented by Nanogrande is capable of producing structures in the submicron range up to a maximum volume of 10 x 10 x 2.5 cm. Notably, the process works with unconventional particles, such as fibers or flakes, and is able to combine different materials in a single print. Be sure to visit their booth 3.1-B30U and meet Juan Schneider, President of Nanogrande. To view a complete list of this year’s winners click here.
Joining the this year’s mission are the following; Precision ADM, Kilmarnock Enterprise, AON3D, Renishaw Canada, McGill University, The University of Waterloo, Québec Metallurgy Centre (CMQ), Exergy Solutions, Promation, Axis Prototypes, Anubis 3D and CAD MicroSolutions.
We thank the following companies for hosting our delegation; BigRep, BASF 3D Printing Solutions, DMG MORI, 3D Systems, ADD UP, Renishaw, Fraunhofer, GE Additive, SLM Solutions and Tekna.
Formnext is the leading AM trade-show and the next generation of intelligent manufacturing solutions. It focuses on the efficient realization of parts and products, from their design to serial production. See cutting-edge technologies your company can leverage to gain a competitive edge and the latest expertise that can help in reducing your time-to-market. For more about Formnext click here.
On October 24th, Canada Makes successfully concluded the forth Canada Makes Additive Manufacturing (AM) Forum at the University of Waterloo. The event was highlighted by leading international and national AM experts who shared their knowledge and insight in this emerging technology. Many in attendance requested the presentations see below for links to the ones available.
See more about the event at LEADING AM EXPERTS SHOWCASED AT CANADA MAKES FORUM
Below are the presentations that we have permission to share with the public. Note: Some may have modified the content.
|Names of presenter||Biographies and links to presentations|
Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU,
Group Manager AM Applications
|Presentation: Laser Beam Melting drives efficiency of tooling applications
Mathias Gebauer studied mechanical engineering with a specialization in production engineering at the University of Applied Sciences in Dresden. He started his career as a casting technologist for a medium-sized automotive supplier in the field of light metal low-pressure sand casting. His responsibilities included technological support for prototype and small-series components as well as cooperation in innovation management. For more than nine years Mr. Gebauer has been working as a research associate at the Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU. At the Dresden branch, Mr. Gebauer works as a group manager in the department “Additive Manufacturing”, where he is responsible for the acquisition, planning and implementation of research and development projects regarding AM for tooling and the technological development of the laser beam melting process. Mr. Gebauer has been involved in additive manufacturing for more than twelve years.
|Cassidy Silbernagel||Presentation: How Additive Manufacturing has shaped the automotive sector and is driving it into the future
Cassidy has been active with 3D printing since 2010 and is about to complete an additive manufacturing PhD in the UK. He has worked for several years prior to his PhD as a mechanical design engineer and has helped develop electric motors for motorcycles and generators for wind turbines. He is researching how additive manufacturing can be used to help create electric motors. He is a two time winner in the student category of the Additive World Design Challenge in 2016 and 2017.
|Dylan Yazbeck, Lab Supervisor at Jesse Garant Metrology Center||Presentation: CT Scanning
Dylan Yazbeck is the lab supervisor at Jesse Garant Metrology Center. He started his Computer Tomography career working as a data analyst, focusing on scanning and analysing client products. The countless hours working in this role working with thousands of unique products allows him to oversee lab operation and work closely with clients establishing specific procedures on a project basis. The creation of new CT procedures at the company has allowed ISO9001: 2015 and AS9100 certification. The opportunity to continuously improve and learn within the CT industry matching procedure with client expectation and requirement makes Dylan excited to continue his role.
|Ed Bernard, Director of Research & Development at Crest Mold Technologies Inc||Speaking notes: Panel Conformal Cooling – Facts vs Myths and Overcoming Obstacles
Ed Bernard has over 40 years of experience in the Moldmaking Industry, having received numerous awards and accolades for innovative achievements and leadership within the manufacturing sector, and is currently the Chair of the Research & Development Committee and Director of the Moldmaking Cluster Collaboration Network of the Canadian Association of Moldmakers as well as the Manager of Scientific Research & Experimental Development at Crest Mold Technology Inc. where he has been experimenting with various different types of advanced manufacturing, essential to conformal thermal systems, for the application of cyclic process thermodynamics.
|Steve Slusher, Executive, AddWorks Manufacturing Development Leader (GE)||Speaking notes: Prototyping to Production
As an Executive leader within our AddWorks organization, Steve Slusher is leading a team of design and manufacturing engineers along with data scientist whom partner with our customers to industrialize their additive manufacturing process. In this role he championed the upgrades of the M2 product line and brought analytics to the forefront to improve both machine and product repeatability. Steve has been with GE for 16 years with roles in design, test and certification. He has led teams on several GE Aviation Commercial product lines. Since joining GE Additive a year and a half ago Steve has established a multi-regional team to industrialize the existing laser and electron beam product line and the surrounding processes. The team has worked with both internal and external customers to help them advance their additive journey into piece part production.
|C. Annette Langhammer, Director of Advanced Engineering NMC Dynaplas, Toronto||Presentation: Conformal Cooling in Automotive/Mobility
BA Econ, York; Toolmaker Ticket Magna; 30 yrs primarily Magna/Decoma; NMC Dynaplas – Technical Captive Injection Molder; focusing on assisting customers migrate to high performing thermoplastic materials including lightweighting, design flexibility, recyclability, performance improvements.
|Mathieu Fagnan, Pratt & Whitney Canada||Presentation: Additive Manufacturing at Pratt & Whitney Canada
Mathieu has been involved with technology since his teens, welding bicycle frames in his parents shed. He fueled his passion for making stuff by completing a technical degree in industrial engineering that saw him entered the world of composites manufacturing, mostly in process optimization for helicopters components. Still hungry for knowledge, he completed a bachelor in Mechanical Engineering and moved toward faster moving vehicles, contributing in core design, supply chain technical support and manufacturing equipment technology for turbine engines at Pratt & Whitney Canada. Mathieu now leads the deployment of Additive Manufacturing Technologies at P&WC. With his team, Mathieu is taking over the challenge of building the whole design system to incorporate AM to the P&WC toolbox of qualified manufacturing processes.
|Roger Eybel, Materials and Processes Group Leader/Safran Expert
Safran Landing Systems
|Presentation: Safran Helicopter Engines process for AM combustion parts
Roger Eybel is a graduate of Queen’s University (Canada) in Metallurgical Engineering (1986). Mr. Eybel has been with Safran approximately 29 years and is presently a senior Safran Expert (Senior Technical Fellow). His work on emerging technology projects has included new alloy development (i.e. AF1410, AerMet 100, beta titaniums, etc.), new coatings, metal matrix composites, solid state welding and now additive manufacturing. Mr. Eybel has long been involved in SAE metals committees which have included AMEC, ASEC, P17,B, D, E, F,G and additive manufacturing, and presently a sponsor of three AMS documents.
|François Charron-Doucet, Director of Quality Control and Scientific Director at Groupe AGÉCO||Presentation: Greening the Aerospace Supply Chain
Mr. Charron-Doucet is Director of Quality Control and Scientific Director at Groupe AGÉCO. François Charron-Doucet received a diploma in engineering physics in 2004 (École Polytechnique de Montreal), and obtained his Master’s degree in 2007 from the same university with a thesis on greenhouse gas project quantification using Life Cycle Assessment. He held a position at the CIRAIG, Interuniversity Research Centre in Life Cycle Analysis, from 2007 to 2010 as research associate and as scientific director at Quantis Canada (now Groupe AGECO) from 2010 to 2015. He is a CSA Group Certified GHG Verifier and a recognized verifier for several North American and European environmental product declaration programs, including the International EPD System (Sweden) and CSA (Canada). He is member of the CAC/ISO/TC207/SC3 – Environmental Labelling Canadian mirror committee.
|Thomas A. Houle, Director, LUMEX NA for Matsuura USA||Presentation: Conformal Cooling LUMEX NA for Matsuura
Thomas Houle is an experienced Manufacturing Professional with a demonstrated history of success in the tooling and plastics industry. He is skilled in new product development, Program Management, Sales and Business development, new Technology adoption and Manufacturing systems and experienced with in-mold sensing and monitoring to measure mold and part performance. Houle has 27 years of continuing experience in the injection mold and molding industry developing turn-key projects for customers all around the globe. In his role as Director, LUMEX NA for Matsuura USA, Tom leverages his experience in operational excellence and continues to develop a cutting-edge, innovative U.S. presence for Matsuura’s Hybrid AM Manufacturing solution. He inspires a culture of continuous improvement by defining goals, developing strategies, implementing systems and measuring performance results for the LUMEX product.
Agent de recherche et développement
|Presentation: Additive Manufacturing at the CRIQ and recent Initiatives
Olivier Marcotte holds a master’s degree in mechanical engineering. He has held the position of research and development officer at the Center de recherche industrielle du Québec (CRIQ) since 2009. As such, he participated in the establishment of a metal additive manufacturing laboratory for industrial applications in 2014. This laboratory aims to familiarize Quebec companies with this technology of the future by providing access to the equipment and expertise of CRIQ staff. For close to 2 years, he has been working on the development of a new additive manufacturing laboratory that will be dedicated to the medical applications of 3D printing. This laboratory, created in partnership with a group of local hospitals, will aim to develop new applications of 3D printing in the medical field, be it patient-specific metal implants, cutting guides, anatomical models or other applications of interest.
Thank you once again to our Sponsors: